Debunking "Intelligent Design on Christian Commentary" Pt#2

	Duration: 07:02 minutes Upload Time: 07-05-16 11:04:24 User: Desertphile :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day
Description: This video debunks the lies and falsehoods in the video "Intelligent Design on Christian Commentary." This is part twp of my two part series refuting that video.
Comments
Desertphile ::: Favorites "I.E. irreducibly complex." IC is a religious belief. I accept the fact that Behe accepts evolution as having occurred, and he also accepts the fact of common descent among species. He is still a Creationist because he believes the gods directed and direct mutation. 07-07-28 11:45:55 _____________________________________________________
ericknac ::: Favorites 4) He mentions the flagellum being able to function with 18 of 68 parts (I think those are the numbers). Again, WHO, WHERE, WHEN? Quote sources or I will not believe you. AND even if that is true, that STILL leaves 18 parts that are irreducibly complex. This is simply an exercise to stir up "fundmentalists" on your side against "fundamentalists" on the other side. IF this is an excellent job, I definitely do not want to see a poorly done job. 07-07-28 05:34:33 _____________________________________________________
ericknac ::: Favorites 2) Behe's book debunked? BY WHO? WHERE? WHEN? They must explain each of Behe's systems. No one has. One article says the floor could be the base of a mouse trap Behe uses for his intro example. 3) WHO said irreducible complexity would be found? WHEN? WHERE? Claims without proof are for people who have made up their minds. Look up Ernst Haeckel's mistakes , one of Darwin's strongest proponents, about complexity. (chapt. 23 "The Panda's Thumb" by Stephen J. Gould) 07-07-28 05:31:41 _____________________________________________________
ericknac ::: Favorites I stopped watching this video half way through for several reasons. 1) He says that Michael Behe's book is creationist nonsense. Behe is not a creationist. He uses scientific evidence to prove systems, like blood clotting, could not function as anything less than it is. I.E. irreducibly complex. Behe addresses the bias toward materialism of science, but he never ventures any explanation of WHO designed everything. I hope that Desertphile is simply uninformed, and not dishonest. (cont.) 07-07-28 05:13:32 _____________________________________________________
BingoTheClowno666 ::: Favorites it's just so sad that this guy probably didn't learn the least bit from your efforts. Still, keep up the good work, desert. 07-07-14 05:04:02 _____________________________________________________
menotfree ::: Favorites Good gods this is great! You really destroyed the silly fool. I pity him. 07-05-19 14:38:37 _____________________________________________________
menotfree ::: Favorites This clown certainly doesn't ack christ-like. Maybe he is trying to smear all Christians with his lies and silly bullshit. 07-05-17 20:51:40 _____________________________________________________
Damotclese ::: Favorites The author does an excellent job of debunking Creationist kooks. 07-05-17 15:20:05 _____________________________________________________
Kailoa36 ::: Favorites Well done! 07-05-17 11:34:29 _____________________________________________________